Every Friday we have our coffee morn at Centotre in central Edinburgh.
A ton of things are covered, some cracking stuff, some nonsense, some inspirational, some unintelligible.
I try and log about the issues discussed sometime sharpish afterwards.
(And often forget things, I know, I know, or don't hear stuff going on in other conversations. It's an age thing perhaps ;-)
Earlier this week Jamie suggested we aggregate all our posts about CMorn in one place.
The Andy and MrW also suggested something similar; with MrW informing us about: http://www.suprglu.com,
Particularly so we, and you dear reader could have easy access to all the links about all the things we think are interesting.
Yahoo Pipes, were discussed, (beyond me right now), ma.gnolia, the venerable del.icio.us and Jamie's tool du jour, ning.
Here's the recent correspondence:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jamie Clague
Date: 8 March 2007 11:03:25 GMT
To: Michael Coulter
Subject: Ning & 2 Minutes to London
Hi Mike
Hope you enjoyed barcamp?
I've been toying with this idea for the coffee mornings, what do you think?
http://edcoffee2point0.ning.com/
See you Friday?
Jamie
_________
On 8 Mar 2007, at 11:23, Michael Coulter wrote:
Jamie,
Re ning.com let's talk about that tomorrow.
Do you remember that Groucho Marx quote, "I'd never join a club that would have me as a member!"
Well, the thing I like about Coffee Morn is that it is kind of loose and not formalised.
I think a standalone online home like ning might make people think they are obliged to join?
When we post randomly about the coffee morns on our individual blogs, we in a sense have a social network.
If we embrace ning, won't we have to post twice> Once on our own blogs and once on ning?
So I'm not sure what ning brings to the party other than yet another place for everyone to subscribe to, showing them content that's already been posted elsewhere.
But as I say, we can explore the benefits/drawbacks tomorrow.
cheers,
Mike
___________
Jamie replied:
.....thought everyone's blogs could filtered through Yahoo Pipes when Coffee Morning was mention and outputted to the Ning page.
Mike replies:
Jamie,
I have to admit, as a humble creative, the pipes and filtering blog posts to ning, is beyond me.
Let's chat tomorrow and see if there is anything we can do with this.
If I understand you correctly, it could be used like a 'category' on a blog platform.
Only in this case, unlike a blog, which aggregates all the posts in a tagged category, ning, would aggregate all the coffee morn posts from every attendees blogs?
Automatically??
Anyhow, your right, back to work for me, let's pick it up again tomorrow,
M
___________
So then after yesterday's CM, Andy and MrW brought up a very similar idea and emailed me this morn about it:
On 09/03/07, Andy Hyde wrote:Having given up trying to achieve anything else today I've been thinking
about the chat around bookmarks and coffee mornings. How can we capture
the great resources that get thrown into Friday morning conversations?
1. ma.gnolia does offer a groups thing as I think Johnnie mentioned.
There's one for social media at http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/SocialMedia
as an example - presumably we could have one for coffee mornings too.
Those with a laptop on the table could post the links mentioned there
and then... plus, if you can't be there you don't miss the links. I
guess we can import links from there into blogs and our own
delicious-type accounts too?
2. could we use something like yahoo pipes to filter out blog posts with
a coffee morning tag and aggregate them into one feed - and shove that
into ma.gnolia too?
3. does this make any sense at all?
Just some Friday thoughts...have a good weekend
Andy
--
Andy Hyde
http://recentchanges.wordpress.com
To which I replied:
superglu-coffee-bookmark-thing? Inbox
Andy, Mr W,
I'll forward this too to Jamie.
He suggested something very similar earlier this week.
See here:
http://edcoffee2point0.ning.com/
(Incidentally, Jamie also came up with the title: Edinburgh 2.0 which I think is terrific.)
Anyway, I wasn't too sure about the idea and thought it might just replicate stuff needlessly.
I think I was mistaken and got the wrong end of what might be a very good stick.
My interpretation was that it just repackeaged stuff we'd done anyways.
On reflection about Jamie's ideas, and yours chaps, it might be a labour saving device and aggregation tool.
So, Nil point Michel!
Let's talk about it next week and decide the coolest/easist? way to do this.
M.
Recent Comments